The Black Book Emerges: Day 4 of The Maxwell Trial

Following a series of emotionally intense courthouse sessions earlier this week, Thursday’s proceedings commenced this morning at the SDNY courthouse with testimony given by the fourth witness of the trial: Paul Kane of NYC's Professional Children's School. Kane would be asked by prosecutors to verify the validity of a document listing Jeffrey Epstein as “person of financial responsibility” for a 12th grade student’s application to NYC's Professional Children's School. Paul would then be cross-examined and excused by the defense. Kane’s testimony would result in several objections and a sidebar regarding the legitimacy of information displayed on the document after the defense attempted to misrepresent evidence to the jury by leading the witness. 

Dr Lisa Rocchio, the fifth witness to take the stand, was introduced by the prosecution as a grooming prevention expert. Her testimony would discuss known and repeated strategies (also employed by Maxwell and Epstein) to groom underage sex trafficking victims. These predatory behaviors included establishing relationships with the parents of the child in an effort to gain the child’s trust, persuading trafficking victims with gifts or money, gradually normalizing sexual assault and abuse, and isolating their victims from potential support groups (also a known cult strategy). 

Rocchio’s recollection of previous instances of abuse she’s observed during her time as a professional paints an incredibly grim picture of the predatory, manipulative strategies pursued by pedophiles that aim to groom children for sex. 

“I've seen grooming in the Boy Scouts through a special camping trip. Or jewelry, anything to make the children feel they are appreciated.”

Continuous objections to Rocchio’s testimony by the defense would provoke the day’s first private sidebar called by Judge Nathan. Rocchio made statements acknowledging the high occurrence of repeated abuse suffered by child sex trafficking victims, responding “very common” when asked “how often is it for a child to be abused by the same perp.” The grooming prevention expert would also explain that it is statistically unlikely for any child who is being sex trafficked to attempt to report the abuse to the police. 

Cross-examination of Dr Rocchio would soon bring several objections from prosecution as defense attempted to lead the witness to comment on unrelated hypothetical situations relating to the effect of brain injuries and alcohol on memory recall. Judge Nathan sustained several objections made on the grounds of lacking foundational relevance. Maxwell’s Defense team excused Dr Rocchio.

Juan Patricio Alessi was called by prosecution next. The sixth individual to occupy the witness stand. An Ecuadorian national, Juan stated he was formerly employed by Lex Wexner’s mother. Juan had worked on Ms. Wexner’s house (where he had met Epstein, who eventually hired him as a house manager). Juan would proceed to disclose he possessed a close relationship with both Maxwell and Epstein, stating he had his own room at Epstein’s Palm Beach mansion and would “bring his wife and other girls to help him” when working for the now deceased pedophile. Juan would also describe Ghislaine Maxwell as the “lady” of Epstein’s house, stating Maxwell accompanied him to Palm Beach “95 percent of the time”. Juan also suggested he had reduced contact with Epstein once Maxwell started handling Jeffrey’s schedule and affairs.

Alessi would proceed to reference a checklist given to him by Maxwell stating specifics relating to how employees of Epstein were expected to conduct themselves. One line reading “Remember that you see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing, except to answer a question directed at you.” Other requests made by Maxwell that he felt were particularly “degrading” were also detailed, providing insight into efforts made by Ghislaine within her social life to demean and humiliate those around her, perhaps a quality nurtured and encouraged by her now deceased father. 

Alessi also disclosed a visit to Epstein’s Island.

“I was on a cruise with my wife to St. Thomas. They picked us up and showed us Little St. James. It was huge.”

Juan proceeded to inform prosecution of the normalized routine of Epstein’s child sex abuse, stating he remembered Epstein would receive three massages a day. Alessi would describe numerous occasions that he had cleaned up Epstein’s massage rooms. This testimony would also identify several other individuals that were present at Epstein’s Palm Beach Mansion, specifically mentioning the presence of Maxwell’s assistant (then Sarah Kellen) and recalling several instances of witnessing “Jane” and Epstein child sex trafficking victim Virginia Giuffre Roberts at Epstein’s Florida address. 

Alessi also testified as to the authenticity of both Epstein black books (both the 1997 copy and 2015 copy leak by Gawker was authenticated), also mentioning Maxwell kept a call directory (engraved with her initials) that he had witnessed. Juan stated he had seen these books on several separate occasions and recalled they were “full of names” acknowledging the evidence as known to him.  This is significant, as it allows attorneys to reference the black books as legitimate accounts of evidence, providing tools for prosecution to evaluate the motivations for Epstein possessing such relationships.

Thursday’s court proceedings would conclude with Alessi identifying several individuals present in photos with Epstein that were on display inside the Palm Beach Mansion. Juan stated, “Photos of Epstein with important people… Donald Trump, The Pope, Fidel Castro, I think.” Alessi also stated he had been questioned by police after receiving $6,300 from Epstein but was not arrested. Juan recalled signing a Non-Disclosure Agreement when working for Maxwell and Epstein, a common tactic implored by abusers in efforts to convince the victim of illegitimate legal understandings (as, by law, an NDA cannot apply to information relating to an illegal activity in any way). 

Alessi’s testimony will continue tomorrow as defense opens proceedings with a cross-examination of witness Alessi. Day five trial coverage available tomorrow as prosecution builds upon significant testimony that demonstrates the global reach of Epstein’s relationships and operation. Juan’s efforts to identify several influential individuals present in Epstein’s photos will provide further grounds for lines of questioning focused on discerning the implicit involvement of these public figures.

Disclaimer: The publisher does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in this page.  All statements and expressions herein are the sole opinion of the author or paid advertiser.

The Free Press Report is a publisher of financial information, not an investment advisor.  We do not provide personalized or individualized investment advice or information that is tailored to the needs of any particular recipient.  

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED ON THIS WEBSITE IS NOT AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSTRUED AS INVESTMENT ADVICE, AND DOES NOT PURPORT TO BE AND DOES NOT EXPRESS ANY OPINION AS TO THE PRICE AT WHICH THE SECURITIES OF ANY COMPANY MAY TRADE AT ANY TIME.  THE INFORMATION AND OPINIONS PROVIDED HEREIN SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN AS SPECIFIC ADVICE ON THE MERITS OF ANY INVESTMENT DECISION.  INVESTORS SHOULD MAKE THEIR OWN INVESTIGATION AND DECISIONS REGARDING THE PROSPECTS OF ANY COMPANY DISCUSSED HEREIN BASED ON SUCH INVESTORS’ OWN REVIEW OF PUBLICLY AVAILABLE INFORMATION AND SHOULD NOT RELY ON THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN.

No statement or expression of opinion, or any other matter herein, directly or indirectly, is an offer or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities or financial instruments mentioned.  

Any projections, market outlooks or estimates herein are forward looking statements and are inherently unreliable.  They are based upon certain assumptions and should not be construed to be indicative of the actual events that will occur.  Other events that were not taken into account may occur and may significantly affect the returns or performance of the securities discussed herein.  The information provided herein is based on matters as they exist as of the date of preparation and not as of any future date, and the publisher undertakes no obligation to correct, update or revise the information in this document or to otherwise provide any additional material.

The publisher, its affiliates, and clients of the a publisher or its affiliates may currently have long or short positions in the securities of the companies mentioned herein, or may have such a position in the future (and therefore may profit from fluctuations in the trading price of the securities).  To the extent such persons do have such positions, there is no guarantee that such persons will maintain such positions.

Neither the publisher nor any of its affiliates accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss howsoever arising, directly or indirectly, from any use of the information contained herein.

By using the Site or any affiliated social media account, you are indicating your consent and agreement to this disclaimer and our terms of use. Unauthorized reproduction of this newsletter or its contents by photocopy, facsimile or any other means is illegal and punishable by law.

For Full Terms of Use Click HERE. For the Privacy Policy Click HERE.

patriotone.substack.com (“The Free Press Report”) is a website owned and operated by Substack. The Free Press Report is paid fees by the companies that make investment offerings on this website. Be aware that payment of these fees may put The Free Press Report in a conflict of interest with the investor. By accessing this website or any page thereof, you agree to be bound by the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, in effect at the time you access this website or any page thereof. The Terms of Use and Privacy Policy may be amended from time to time. Nothing on this website shall constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or subscribe for, any securities to any person in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation is against the law or to anyone to whom it is unlawful to make such offer or solicitation. The Free Press Report is not an underwriter, broker-dealer, Title III crowdfunding portal or a valuation service and does not engage in any activities requiring any such registration. The Free Press Report does not provide advice on investments or structure transactions. Offerings made under Regulation A under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act") are available to U.S. investors who are “accredited investors” as defined by Rule 501 of Regulation D under the Securities Act well as non-accredited investors, who are subject to certain investment limitations as set forth in Regulation A under the Securities Act. In order to invest in Regulation A offerings, investors may be asked to fill out a certification and provide necessary documentation as proof of your income and/or net worth to verify that you are qualified to invest in offerings posted on this website. All securities listed on this site are being offered by, and all information included on this site is the responsibility of, the applicable issuer of such securities. The Free Press Report does not verify the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any information. Neither The Free Press Report nor any of its officers, directors, agents and employees makes any warranty, express or implied, of any kind whatsoever related to the adequacy, accuracy, valuations of securities or completeness of any information on this site or the use of information on this site. Neither The Free Press Report nor any of its directors, officers, employees, representatives, affiliates or agents shall have any liability whatsoever arising from any error or incompleteness of fact, or lack of care in the preparation of, any of the materials posted on this website. Investing in securities, especially those issued by start-up companies, involves substantial risk. investors should be able to bear the loss of their entire investment and should make their own determination of whether or not to make any investment based on their own independent evaluation and analysis.